跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Hongyao Tang, Yi Ma, Pengyi Li, Yifu Yuan·· 5 小时前AI 评分43

广义智能体迭代:统一形式化迭代策略改进与递归自我改进的框架

Generalized Agent Iteration: One Formal Framework for Iterative Policy Improvement and Recursive Self-Improvement

AI 导读

arXiv 论文提出广义智能体迭代(GAI),一个将经典迭代策略改进与递归自我改进(RSI)统一为同一学习范式的形式化框架。GAI 把智能体定义为系统中可修改组件的配置,学习过程为智能体评估与改进的循环,并用两个维度区分各实例:改进机制是否属于智能体内部、衡量标准是否锚定在外部,据此判定系统属于 anchored、goal drift 或完全自指。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:When we speak of recursive self-improvement (RSI), are we speaking of a phenomenon, a mechanism, or a prospect? Towards autonomous and evolving intelligence, RSI is being claimed at many scales, while no single framework that formally describes these emerging instances exists. Its counterpart in the classical realm, iterative policy improvement, is characterized by generalized policy iteration (GPI), a framework of broad applicability with well-understood theoretical properties, but only where the update principle and the evaluation base lie outside the agent. In this paper, we propose Generalized Agent Iteration (GAI), a formal framework that describes iterative policy improvement and RSI as two cases of a single learning paradigm. GAI defines the agent as a configuration of modifiable components within a system and models the learning process as a cycle of agent evaluation and agent improvement. Two pivotal dials then distinguish the instances, in particular the systems that self-identify as RSI in recent work: whether the improving mechanism is part of the agent and whether the standard it is measured against is grounded outside it. The former dial delineates the boundary between GPI and RSI, and the latter determines a system's polarity as anchored, goal drift, or fully self-referential. Moreover, we use these coordinates to place existing systems on the same two axes and make the defects of recursive self-improvement statable one condition at a time. We see this paper as a first step toward exploring a formal characterization of RSI that rests on the classical account, makes existing systems comparable, and provides a principled basis for analyzing and designing new ones.
Comments: version 2
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.13406 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2609.13406v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13406

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Hongyao Tang [view email]
[v1] Fri, 11 Sep 2026 18:15:09 UTC (39 KB)
[v2] Thu, 29 Oct 2026 05:38:29 UTC (47 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org