跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Daniel Furman, Preeya Kirani, Ibrahim Sheikh, Zhen Li, Peter Zhong, Michele Catasta·· 2 小时前精选AI 评分60

Replit 发布 ViBench 2.0 基准:评估长周期智能体软件构建

ViBench 2.0: A Benchmark for Long-Horizon Software Building

AI 导读

Replit 团队发布 ViBench 2.0 基准,用于评估长周期软件构建能力,含 17 个全栈 Web 产品、241 条功能请求和 544 个由浏览器智能体执行的测试计划,仅在成品阶段判分。

推荐理由

论文给出长周期软件开发基准的设计与九个模型实测结果,读者可据此了解智能体从局部通过到完整交付之间的可靠性差距。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:On Replit, our agentic engineering platform, users now build entire products without writing code, through successive feature requests to an agent. Yet existing coding benchmarks evaluate single, fully specified tasks, and many are near saturation. We introduce ViBench 2.0, a benchmark for long-horizon software building that we use to select our platform's models. Its 17 full-stack web products, modeled on widely used software, grow over 241 feature requests and are judged only when finished, as a user would judge them: a browser agent runs 544 test plans, and a build passes only if every plan does, under a grading protocol validated to keep this strict score reliable. Evaluating nine models, we find a reliability gap: the three strongest pass up to 98% of test plans yet deliver a fully working product in at most 65% of builds, and no open-weight model delivers one. The gap is closing fast: across three releases of one model family, pass@1 on the public products rises from 3% to 53% while the cost per build falls by more than half. We release eight products with the harness and grader, hold out nine, and report lessons from production use.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
ACM classes: I.2.2; D.2.5; D.2.8
Cite as: arXiv:2611.05620 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2611.05620v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.05620

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Peter Yong Zhong [view email]
[v1] Tue, 3 Nov 2026 21:04:39 UTC (564 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org