跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Ushnish Sarkar, Vineet Kumar Rakesh, Bhaswar Chattopadhyay, Tapas Samanta·· 1 小时前AI 评分37

低资源词典场景下手语检索研究:基于 ASL-Citizen 训练的姿态编码器零训练迁移

Studies on Sign Language Retrieval in Low-Resource Dictionary Settings

AI 导读

该研究测试仅用单一手语训练的姿态编码器能否在无目标语言训练的情况下服务其他手语。在 ASL-Citizen 上用度量学习训练的编码器冻结后在土耳其、俄罗斯、印度等六种手语数据集上评估,单条注册视频的首位命中率 36.4-80.7%,优于最佳免学习方法(16.0-69.6%)和 OpenHands 图网络(六目标均值 39.3%)。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Most sign languages have no annotated corpus, only small dictionaries with one or a few example videos per sign. This study examines how well a pose encoder trained on a single sign language serves such languages without any target-language training.
An encoder trained with metric learning on American Sign Language (ASL-Citizen) is evaluated frozen on six datasets of Turkish, Russian, Indian, Argentinian, Pakistani and Sri Lankan sign languages, with one or four clips per sign enrolled and, where
signer identities are available, the query's signer excluded from the gallery. With one enrolled clip, the encoder retrieves the correct sign first in 36.4-80.7 % of queries, against 16.0-69.6 % for the best learning-free method (angle-based dynamic
time warping) and a six-target mean of 39.3 % for an ASL-trained OpenHands graph network. In a crossed ablation of the encoder (embedding geometry, aggregation of body and hand embeddings, training objective, and attention between articulators), two
choices matter: a per-pair InfoNCE objective outperforms supervised contrastive and cross-entropy training, and blocking attention between body, left hand and right hand inside the encoder raises accuracy by up to 5.1 points. The best configuration
reaches 68.0 % one-shot accuracy (59.0 % for the reference encoder). On CISLR, an Indian Sign Language dictionary of 4,765 words with one video per word, the encoders find the correct word first for 17.3-19.0 % of queries, above the 16.8 % of the
original RGB baseline. Over eight seeds with the joint encoder, spherical, Euclidean and hyperbolic embedding spaces differ by at most 1.6 points, except the hyperbolic token-attention head trained with InfoNCE, which is 1.4-2.0 points worse, so the
geometry is a minor factor.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2611.16621 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2611.16621v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.16621

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ushnish Sarkar [view email]
[v1] Thu, 12 Nov 2026 10:57:50 UTC (3,121 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org