arXiv cs.AI· Jisheng Dang, Huaiyuan Peng, Wencan Zhang, Bimei Wang, Jingwen Zhao, Wenjun Ma, Hong Peng, Bin Hu, Qi Tian, Tat-Seng Chua·· 3 小时前AI 评分36
DRA-SAM:面向低空无人机指代分割的分歧驱动主动 SAM 方法
DRA-SAM: Disagreement-Driven Referential Active SAM for Low-Altitude Drone Referring Segmentation
AI 导读
研究者提出 DRA-SAM,一种分歧驱动的低空无人机指代分割框架,通过对候选假设的分歧与未决状态分配额外的局部重推理来提升分割精度。其免训练的 Referential Disagreement LOOK 策略选择裁剪区域,由 SAM3-I 主干进行局部推理并更新假设。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:Referring segmentation in low-altitude drone imagery requires distinguishing small, visually similar instances under complex linguistic and spatial constraints. Global inference may yield multiple plausible masks or leave the intended referent insufficiently represented, motivating selective local re-inference. We propose DRA-SAM, a disagreement-driven framework that allocates an additional inference pass according to competing referential hypotheses and an unresolved state. A lightweight EvidenceScorer estimates beliefs over existing candidates and the unresolved state. A training-free Referential Disagreement LOOK policy balances belief-weighted candidate competition and unresolved-region coverage to select a crop for local re-inference. The same benchmark-adapted SAM3-I backbone processes the selected region, and the resulting evidence updates existing hypotheses and introduces new candidates. Among the compared methods, DRA-SAM achieves state-of-the-art performance on six of seven test metrics on both RIS-LAD and UAVid-RIS, including mIoU and [email protected]@0.9, and on all seven RIS-LAD validation metrics. On RIS-LAD, DRA-SAM improves the matched global SAM3-I baseline from 49.55 to 52.34 mIoU and from 46.80 to 58.05 [email protected]. On UAVid-RIS, the independently adapted DRA-SAM achieves 73.26 mIoU and 86.86 [email protected]. Controlled crop-policy comparisons demonstrate the effectiveness of disagreement-guided crop selection, while target-size analysis reveals particularly pronounced gains for aerial targets occupying less than 1% of an image. These results establish referential disagreement as an effective criterion for allocating local inference. Code is available at this https URL.
| Comments: | 10 pages, 5 figures |
| Subjects: | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.33057 [cs.CV] |
| (or arXiv:2610.33057v1 [cs.CV] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.33057 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Huaiyuan Peng [view email]
[v1]
Mon, 19 Oct 2026 08:56:35 UTC (26,774 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org