跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Xinyu Zou, Jian Ma, Liang Ma, Chen Lu, Tao Peng, Yingjie Li·· 3 小时前AI 评分38

时频-工况多模态融合基础模型 TFC-MMFD 用于旋转机械通用故障诊断

A Time-Frequency-Condition Multimodal Fusion Foundation Model for Universal Rotating-Machinery Fault Diagnosis under Multi-Element Heterogeneous Scenarios

AI 导读

arXiv 论文提出 TFC-MMFD,一种面向多要素异构场景下旋转机械故障诊断的时频-工况多模态融合基础模型,将统计指标、时频图像、振动序列与文本描述统一 token 化,经 LLaMA 骨干、跨模态双向注意力和 Q-Former 提炼为故障模式查询。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Intelligent fault diagnosis models are typically developed for a single machine under a specific set of operating conditions, such that each new machine or condition requires retraining from scratch. This one-machine-one-model paradigm scales poorly. Although transfer learning and domain generalization can reduce the labeling burden, they primarily seek domain-invariant commonality, potentially discarding machine-specific characteristics that are critical for diagnosis. This paper proposes TFC-MMFD, a time-frequency-condition multimodal fusion foundation model for rotating-machinery fault diagnosis under multi-element heterogeneous scenarios. Statistical indicators, time-frequency images, vibration sequences, and textual machine and condition descriptions are tokenized into a unified language-like space, allowing inputs of different physical origin to be represented as a single sequence. A LLaMA backbone, together with cross-modal bidirectional attention and a Q-Former, then distills this sequence into fault-mode queries. Diagnosis is performed by matching these queries against natural-language fault-mode anchors rather than fixed class indices, while regression-adversarial condition disentanglement and condition-conditioned masked pre-training improve robustness to changing conditions. Across four progressive tasks on ten public bearing datasets spanning diverse bearing types, speeds, and loads, TFC-MMFD attains 99.40% accuracy and 99.16% macro-F1, maintains over 80% accuracy on most interpolated unseen conditions without adaptation, and improves from 20.26% to 95.63% accuracy on an unseen machine with only five labeled samples per class. It outperforms the strongest of eight domain-generalization baselines by 10.57 percentage points and compares favorably with a recent bearing foundation model while using less than half of its fine-tuning data.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2611.15051 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2611.15051v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.15051

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yingjie Li [view email]
[v1] Wed, 11 Nov 2026 05:25:10 UTC (3,521 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org