跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Elif Nebioglu, Emirhan Bilgi\c{c}, Adrian Popescu·· 4 小时前精选AI 评分61

arXiv 论文提出 INP-X 诊断:AI 生成图像检测器依赖 VAE 引入的全局频谱伪影

AI-Generated Image Detectors Exploit Global Artifacts: Evidence from Inpainting Exchange

AI 导读

论文提出无需模型访问的单步诊断 Inpainting Exchange(INP-X),将编辑区域外的原始像素还原回去,揭示现有 AI 生成图像检测器依赖的是潜在扩散 inpainting 全图过 VAE 编解码带来的全局频谱伪影,而非真正识别合成内容。

推荐理由

论文提出无需模型访问的 INP-X 诊断,用交换未编辑区域像素实测各类检测器失效,读者可了解其失败机制与缓解方向。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Modern diffusion-based inpainting enables realistic, localized image manipulation, raising critical challenges for reliable detection. We show that state-of-the-art AI-generated image detectors largely fail to identify \emph{what} was synthesized and instead exploit a \emph{global} artifact introduced as a side effect of the generation pipeline: latent-diffusion inpainting passes the entire image through a VAE encoder--decoder, inducing a subtle but pervasive spectral shift even in unedited regions. We turn this observation into a simple, model-free diagnostic, \emph{Inpainting Exchange} (INP-X), that restores the original pixels outside the edited region while preserving all synthesized content. To study the effect at scale, we build a benchmark of $30$K matched real, standard-inpainted, and exchanged triplets ($90$K images) spanning four datasets and three inpainters. INP-X requires no model access and is a single compositing step, yet it collapses pretrained detectors, commercial APIs, and bias-aware methods toward chance (commercial APIs: $>$$90\%\!\to\!\sim$$55\%$; the bias-aware DDA: $97.6\%\!\to\!58.4\%$). We give formal propositions linking the effect to high-frequency attenuation from the VAE information bottleneck, and we causally isolate it with a factorial battery and a variance decomposition that attributes $97\%$ of the background spectral shift to the autoencoder round-trip alone. A perceptual study ($n{=}153$) shows the shift is also perceptible to humans, whose accuracy falls from $63.8\%$ to $56.2\%$ ($p{=}0.002$): significantly reduced, though not eliminated. Finally, we show that mechanism-driven mitigations (mixed-distribution and localization-supervised training) improve robustness, but detecting INP-X edits remains an open problem. Our benchmark and code are available at: this https URL
Comments: Accepted to WACV 2027. 23 pages, 16 figures, 20 tables
Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2602.00192 [cs.CV]
  (or arXiv:2602.00192v2 [cs.CV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.00192

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Emirhan Bilgiç [view email]
[v1] Fri, 30 Jan 2026 09:14:10 UTC (5,278 KB)
[v2] Wed, 4 Nov 2026 19:01:47 UTC (5,983 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org