跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Jannatul Shefa, Alejandro Salado, Paul Wach, Taylan G. Topcu·· 3 小时前AI 评分33

MARQ:模块化、与 LLM 无关且融合系统工程知识的需求质量评估器

MARQ: A Modular, LLM-Agnostic Requirement Quality Assessor Infused with Systems Engineering Knowledge

AI 导读

研究者提出 MARQ,一个模块化、LLM 无关的原型,通过注入 INCOSE 需求质量标准的专家知识栈改进基于大语言模型的需求质量评估。

正文 · 原文

View PDF

Abstract:Requirements engineering (RE) is foundational to systems engineering (SE), as requirement defects can propagate downstream and adversely affect development outcomes. Although large language models (LLMs) are promising for requirement quality assessment, prior work shows that off-the-shelf models miss a large share of expert-identified defects, perform unevenly across quality criteria, and vary across executions. This study investigates whether infusing expert-derived SE knowledge can improve LLM-based requirement quality evaluation beyond off-the-shelf capability. We present MARQ, a modular, LLM-agnostic prototype that supplements LLMs with a criterion-specific knowledge stack operationalizing INCOSE requirement quality criteria and evaluated against off-the-shelf baselines on an expert-labeled NASA requirement set using Claude Opus 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, and the open-weight Gemma 3 12B, with 100 executions per model. MARQ achieves median F1 scores of 0.80 for Claude Opus 5, 0.62 for GPT-5.6 Sol, and 0.53 for Gemma 3 12B, compared with off-the-shelf baselines of 0.55, 0.52, and 0.18, respectively. However, the nature of these gains is model-dependent. Claude Opus 5 improves defect detection and false-alarm control; GPT-5.6 Sol gains detection and better execution-level consistency at the cost of more false alarms; and Gemma 3 12B reaches the performance of off-the-shelf proprietary models, although it remains highly variable. Criterion-level analysis shows gains concentrated in Correctness and Conformance, trade-offs between misses and false alarms within individual criteria, and model-dependent responses across several criteria. These findings position SE knowledge infusion as a promising model-agnostic pathway for strengthening trustworthy LLM-based RE support while underscoring the need for criterion-specific interventions and human-in-the-loop review.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.36234 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.36234v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.36234

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jannatul Shefa [view email]
[v1] Mon, 26 Oct 2026 20:12:11 UTC (1,722 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org