arXiv cs.AI· Xianxiang Zhao, Advik Mehta, Falak Sethi, Brian Gue, Qipei Mei, Lingzi Wu·· 2 小时前AI 评分34
LM-DSB:基于轻量级多智能体系统的建筑施工每日安全公告自动生成
LM-DSB: A Lightweight Multi-agent System for Automated Daily Safety Bulletin Generation in Construction
AI 导读
研究提出 LM-DSB 系统,将 RAG 与本地部署的 Llama 3-8B 结合,在消费级电脑上自动生成建筑施工每日安全公告。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:Construction safety management still struggles to produce daily safety bulletins (DSBs), structured daily communications that identify site-specific hazards, convey safety protocols, and set preventive measures for workers. Manual DSB creation takes 2-3 hours daily and yields inconsistent quality, with 25% of crews never conducting pretask planning (Olson et al., 2016), diverting safety personnel from field supervision. This study proposes the Lightweight Multi-Agent DSB System (LM-DSB), which integrates retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with a locally deployable Large Language Model (LLM) to automate DSB generation on consumer-grade personal computers. LM-DSB coordinates specialized planner, researcher, and writer agents in a hierarchical architecture, enhanced by domain-specific fine-tuning on construction safety documentation and RAG grounding in 37 health, safety, and environment (HSE) documents. A two-phase validation assessed feasibility. Phase 1 comparative evaluation showed the multi-agent RAG system (Llama 3-8B) outperformed all alternative configurations, with strong lexical alignment and coherence (TF-IDF: 0.70, BLEU: 0.39, ROUGE-1: 0.66) and near-complete document generation (length ratio: 1.01 vs. 0.39 for single-agent RAG). Phase 2 expert evaluation (N=40) confirmed practical acceptability (mean scores 3.50-4.20 on a 5-point scale), particularly in regulatory compliance (4.20) and factual accuracy (4.10). The findings show that architectural design enables lightweight models to handle safety-critical documentation on consumer-grade hardware, advancing technology democratization in construction safety management. Limitations include knowledge base scope, language constraints, and lack of field deployment validation; future work should address multimodal integration and workflow adoption.
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.36433 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2610.36433v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.36433 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Xianxiang Zhao [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:29:20 UTC (1,323 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org