跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Amine Lbath, Massih-Reza Amini·· 4 小时前AI 评分48

REva:利用大语言模型上下文探测实现实时漏洞检测

Reva: Real-Time Vulnerability Detection through Contextual Probing of Large Language Models

AI 导读

论文提出 REva(REal-time Vulnerability Analysis),将智能体漏洞检测器的安全上下文与代码理解能力压缩进 LLM 单次前向传播:为每个新函数提供预计算的模块威胁模型、轻量静态分析结果与调用图信息,并用训练好的探针读取 LLM 内部表征。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:A vulnerability costs more to fix the later it is discovered. As coding agents generate code faster than developers can review it, software needs a first line of defense screening each new function in real time. LLM agents have recently become capable of finding real-world vulnerabilities by working as a security expert would: they run analysis tools, explore the surrounding code, test hypotheses and weigh the evidence before forming their own judgement. This reasoning, however, spans many model calls, so that each verdict takes minutes of compute, far too long for real-time screening. Faster detectors, which fine-tune deep learning models or prompt an LLM for a direct verdict, are less accurate: they judge a function without the context an agent gathers, and an LLM's generated verdict is unreliable even when given some of it.
We present REVA (REal-time Vulnerability Analysis), an AI vulnerability detector that brings the security context and code understanding components behind agentic detectors into a single forward pass of an LLM. For each new function, REVA gives the LLM a pre-computed threat model of its module, lightweight static analysis findings and call-graph information. REVA leverages a trained probe to read the LLM's internal representations of the new function in this context. On PrimeVul's held-out test set, REVA on GLM-5.3-Flash reaches 60.0% accuracy in about one second per function. This matches VulTriage (59.2%), the state-of-the-art agentic detector, run on the same LLM, while being over 250 times faster and less than a tenth as costly. On the same prompt, the probe is 14% to 17% more accurate than the LLM's own direct verdict. Across three open LLMs, REVA is at least as accurate as VulTriage, and about 10% more accurate on two of them. An LLM's internal representations thus encode much of what agentic detectors obtain through reasoning.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.35829 [cs.CR]
  (or arXiv:2610.35829v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.35829

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Amine Lbath [view email]
[v1] Mon, 26 Oct 2026 17:50:09 UTC (112 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org