SCHEMA:首个面向科研智能体幻觉的拓扑感知评测框架
Tracing the Cascade: A Topology-Aware Evaluation Framework for Scientific Agent Hallucinations
AI 导读
SCHEMA 是首个基于证据、拓扑感知的科研智能体幻觉评测框架,可从基准种子和文献证据自动构建科学概念图谱,生成论断验证、多跳推理、开放式解释和实验代码生成任务。其轨迹幻觉管线用拓扑加权严重度评分审计中间推理,并用多智能体反事实归因定位失败机理。结果显示幻觉集中在少数高连接知识枢纽,且最终答案准确率与轨迹诚实度脱钩——模型常以结构有缺陷的推理得出正确结论。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in scientific research, where reliability is critical and the underlying knowledge is densely interconnected. In such settings, hallucinations are particularly damaging: a single erroneous claim on a foundational concept can propagate through multi-step reasoning and corrupt entire trajectories. Existing hallucination benchmarks largely operate at the surface level, treating facts in isolation and relying on uniform accuracy metrics that ignore this topological structure. We address this gap with SCHEMA, the first evidence-grounded, topology-aware evaluation framework for hallucinations in scientific agents. SCHEMA automatically constructs scientific concept graphs from benchmark seeds and literature evidence, synthesizes graph-grounded tasks spanning claim verification, multi-hop reasoning, open-ended explanation, and experimental code generation, and evaluates agents with two complementary diagnostics. A trajectory hallucination pipeline audits intermediate reasoning at scale via a topology-weighted severity score, while a multi-agent counterfactual attribution module pinpoints the causal mechanism behind selected failures. SCHEMA reveals that hallucinations concentrate at a small set of highly connected knowledge hubs, and that final-answer accuracy decouples from trajectory honesty; models often reach correct conclusions through structurally flawed reasoning. These results indicate that for high-stakes scientific applications, terminal accuracy alone is an insufficient signal of agent reliability, motivating mechanism-level evaluation grounded in knowledge topology. Code is available at this https URL.
| Comments: | 40 pages, 7 figures and 5 tables |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.00711 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2608.00711v2 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.00711 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Xinshun Feng [view email]
[v1]
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 15:19:10 UTC (23,059 KB)
[v2]
Tue, 27 Oct 2026 11:05:04 UTC (23,579 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org