跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Wen-wai Yim, Yujuan Fu, Asma Ben Abacha, Meliha Yetisgen, Noel Codella, Roberto Andres Novoa, Josep Malvehy·· 3 小时前AI 评分37

DermaVQA-DAS:皮肤病评估模式(DAS)与患者图像问答、分割数据集发布

DermaVQA-DAS: Dermatology Assessment Schema (DAS) & Datasets for Closed-Ended Question Answering & Segmentation in Patient-Generated Dermatology Images

AI 导读

研究者发布 DermaVQA-DAS,是 DermaVQA 数据集的扩展,支持封闭式问答与皮损分割两项任务,配套专家开发的皮肤病评估模式(DAS),含 36 个高层和 27 个细粒度评估问题,提供中英文选项。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Recent advances in dermatological image analysis have been driven by large-scale annotated datasets; however, most existing benchmarks focus on dermatoscopic images and lack patient-authored queries and clinical context, limiting their applicability to patient-centered care. To address this gap, we introduce DermaVQA-DAS, an extension of the DermaVQA dataset that supports two complementary tasks: closed-ended question answering (QA) and dermatological lesion segmentation. Central to this work is the Dermatology Assessment Schema (DAS), a novel expert-developed framework that systematically captures clinically meaningful dermatological features in a structured and standardized form. DAS comprises 36 high-level and 27 fine-grained assessment questions, with multiple-choice options in English and Chinese. Leveraging DAS, we provide expert-annotated datasets for both closed QA and segmentation and benchmark state-of-the-art multimodal models. For segmentation, we evaluate multiple prompting strategies and show that prompt design impacts performance: the default prompt achieves the best results under Mean-of-Max and Mean-of-Mean evaluation aggregation schemes, while an augmented prompt incorporating both patient query title and content yields the highest performance under majority-vote-based microscore evaluation, achieving a Jaccard index of 0.395 and a Dice score of 0.566 with BiomedParse. For closed-ended QA, overall performance is strong across models, with average accuracies ranging from 0.729 to 0.798; o3 achieves the best overall accuracy (0.798), closely followed by GPT-4.1 (0.796), while Gemini-1.5-Pro shows competitive performance within the Gemini family (0.783). We publicly release DermaVQA-DAS, the DAS schema, and evaluation protocols to support and accelerate future research in patient-centered dermatological vision-language modeling (this https URL).
Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2512.24340 [cs.CV]
  (or arXiv:2512.24340v2 [cs.CV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.24340

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Wen-Wai Yim [view email]
[v1] Tue, 30 Dec 2025 16:48:20 UTC (953 KB)
[v2] Mon, 9 Nov 2026 19:24:14 UTC (565 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org