超越精选突破:用随机抽样的数学猜想评估语言模型,OpenConjecture 数据集发布
Beyond Selected Breakthroughs: Evaluating Language Models on Randomly Sampled Mathematical Conjectures
AI 导读
研究者发布 OpenConjecture 数据集,收集 2026 年 2 月以来 arXiv 数学论文中的开放猜想,并用前沿 GPT 模型对随机抽取的 200 个猜想按可复现协议进行三轮测试。模型对约 60% 的猜想给出候选解,反例约为证明的 1.3 倍;部分解偏离作者原意或紧贴已有结果,但也有解具备中等以上新颖性。研究强调评估需超越正确性,考察与原命题的忠实度、归属及数学贡献性质。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:The last year has seen a shift in AI-assisted mathematics, with frontier language models producing proofs of and counterexamples to long-standing open conjectures. However, studying only the current set of major breakthroughs provides an incomplete picture of LLM capabilities and the computational resources needed to achieve reported results. To address this, we introduce a new dataset, OpenConjecture, which collects conjectures from mathematics papers published on the arXiv since February 2026. We use these conjectures as a source of open mathematical problems, and apply frontier GPT models to a random sample of 200 of these conjectures over three passes using a reproducible protocol without problem-specific mathematical guidance. Rather than attempt expert verification of these candidate solutions, we analyze the types of problems for which LLMs produce solutions and the characteristics of these solutions. The models we test produce candidate solutions for roughly 60% of the conjectures, with counterexamples about 1.3 times more common than proofs. We estimate solution novelty, assess how solutions cite and relate to existing literature, and analyze whether the proposed resolution relies on either an error in or underspecification of the conjecture. We find that models sometimes propose resolutions that are outside the authors' intent (e.g., proposing the trivial group as a counterexample) and that a number of proofs follow closely from existing results, but that some resolutions exhibit at least moderate novelty. Our findings underscore the need for evaluations that go beyond correctness to assess fidelity to the intended statement, attribution, and the nature of the mathematical contribution.
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); History and Overview (math.HO) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.40382 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2610.40382v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.40382 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Helen Jenne [view email]
[v1]
Thu, 29 Oct 2026 16:24:55 UTC (2,528 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org