跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Javier Mar\'in·· 2 小时前AI 评分22

ZeroPoint:轻量级基于能量的决策模型

ZeroPoint: Lightweight Energy-Based Decision Model

AI 导读

arXiv 论文提出 ZeroPoint,一种将“空答案”设为能量为零的固定状态的能量决策模型(EBM),为各候选项提供显式参考基准,把“选择还是弃权”纳入常规推理,用负对数似然损失训练。模型使用小型多语言编码器,同时读取输入与全部候选项且对顺序不变。消融显示收益主要来自训练含无可选项示例的数据,固定零点区分有无可接受选项的效果略优于学习的拒绝类别,明显优于阈值化 softmax。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Energy-based models (EBMs) assign a scalar energy to every joint value of the observed and predicted variables. In decision models, the prediction is chosen from a finite list of options provided with each input. Inference then reduces to comparing the energies of the options, and training lowers the energy of the correct option relative to the others. A complete decision must also account for the possibility that no option is acceptable. However, the energies learned by a standard EBM define only relative compatibility: adding the same input-dependent quantity to all energies leaves the predictions, the Gibbs distribution, and the usual training losses unchanged. The model therefore has no learned reference level against which to decide whether any option fits. We propose ZeroPoint, an EBM that makes the empty answer a state of the model with energy zero for every input. This fixed state provides an explicit reference for the energies of all listed options, whose non-negative depths measure their compatibility with the input relative to the empty answer. The options and the empty answer share one distribution, in which an option at zero depth receives no probability. The decision to select an option or to abstain is thus part of ordinary inference, trained with the negative log-likelihood loss, rather than a separate rejection rule. The energy function is a small multilingual encoder that reads the input together with all the options and is invariant to their order. Ablations show that most of the benefit comes from training with examples in which no option fits. With the same encoder and data, the fixed zero separates inputs with and without an acceptable option slightly better than a learned rejection class and clearly better than a thresholded softmax, while leaving the choice among options unchanged.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2611.12992 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2611.12992v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.12992

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Javier Marin [view email]
[v1] Sun, 8 Nov 2026 11:45:16 UTC (239 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org