跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Ali Alawi Balfaqih, Mansur M. Arief·· 1 小时前AI 评分37

可解释 AI 用于货运方式分类的可靠性研究

A Reliability Study of Explainable AI for Freight Mode Classification

AI 导读

一项研究考察了用可解释机器学习对货物进行 Air/Air Charter 或 Truck/Ocean 分类,基于 PEPFAR 供应链交付历史数据集(清洗后 5,964 条记录、47 个特征),比较 MLP、Logistic Regression、Random Forest 和梯度提升。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Machine learning models are increasingly used to support freight transportation decisions, but their predictions are rarely accompanied by evidence that the associated explanations can be trusted. In this study we investigate explainable machine learning for classifying shipments as Air/Air Charter or Truck/Ocean using the PEPFAR Supply Chain Management System Delivery History dataset, with 5,964 shipment records and 47 input features after cleaning, where freight cost and pack price are excluded as near-proxies of the transportation mode. We compare three Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) architectures, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and gradient boosting with imbalance-aware metrics and paired significance tests across one hundred random replications. We then evaluate the explanations themselves, namely the stability of SHAP feature rankings across retraining and across models, the faithfulness of SHAP and LIME attributions under a feature-deletion test, and the geographic structure of the destination effects, which we map for all 38 destination countries. The results suggest that the tree ensembles significantly outperform the neural and linear models (86.8% against 83.3-85.0% mean testing accuracy) while their leading features remain the most stable across retraining. Removing the five features ranked most important by SHAP or LIME changes the predicted probabilities roughly four times as much as removing randomly chosen features. The destination effects form a coherent geographic pattern that simple port access does not explain. However, models with similar accuracy disagree substantially on which features matter most, and thus explanation stability and faithfulness should be assessed before such explanations are used to support freight transport decisions.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2611.15716 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2611.15716v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.15716

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Mansur Arief [view email]
[v1] Wed, 11 Nov 2026 16:55:11 UTC (327 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org