TriageRAG:用失败感知自训练让 RAG 语言模型适配专业领域
TriageRAG: Failure-Aware Self-Training for Adapting Retrieval-Augmented Language Models to Specialized Domains
AI 导读
研究者提出失败感知自训练方法 TriageRAG,用于将 RAG 大语言模型适配到仅有无标注语料的专业领域。该方法对学生模型逐题进行有/无检索上下文的探测,将样本分为 known、solved、context-failure、retrieval-failure 四类并分别路由到对应训练信号,triage 直方图还可作为无标签的领域差距诊断。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) lets large language models (LLMs) answer knowledge-intensive questions from retrieved evidence, but adapting a general-purpose RAG system to a specialized domain such as medicine is difficult when only an unlabeled corpus is available. Self-training approaches such as SimRAG address this by letting the LLM write its own question-answer pairs from domain passages and fine-tuning on the pairs that survive a round-trip consistency filter. We observe that these approaches treat every retained example identically: they never ask whether the student already knows the answer, already extracts it correctly from the retrieved context, or fails - and if so, whether the failure lies with the reader or with the retriever. To tackle this, we propose TriageRAG, a failure-aware self-training approach that probes the student on each self-generated question with and without retrieved context, triages it into one of four categories (known, solved, context-failure, retrieval-failure), and routes each category to the training signal that addresses it, including a parametric route that teaches the reader to answer when retrieval misses. Probing is cheap and repeated every round, so the training mixture follows the student, and the triage histogram doubles as a label-free diagnostic of where the domain gap lies. Experiments on 11 datasets spanning three domains with a Qwen3-4B backbone, and on CS-Bench with Qwen3-8B, demonstrate that TriageRAG outperforms a budget-matched SimRAG by 1.2-6.4 points and is the only method that recovers the closed-book level in every case where retrieval hurts the base model. A single ablation identifies the mechanism: round-trip filtering removes every training context that lacks the evidence, and a reader that never sees such contexts learns to over-trust noisy retrieval.
| Comments: | 19 pages, 4 figures, 8 tables |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.33776 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2610.33776v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.33776 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Samarth Varshney [view email]
[v1]
Sat, 24 Oct 2026 16:26:01 UTC (107 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org