跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Yuval Kainan, Carmit Hershman·· 2 小时前AI 评分37

Agentic Process Evidence(APE):为 AI 智能体开发流程提供可签名防篡改的过程证明

Agentic process evidence

AI 导读

论文提出 Agentic Process Evidence(APE),一种签名、防篡改、机器可读的智能体过程证明,将 AI 智能体会话与其结果关联,实现 process-aware logging。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:The way software gets built is changing dramatically. AI agents now create pull requests, select dependencies, refactor codebases, interpret test failures, and execute infrastructure changes across the entire Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). AI agents are autonomous team members, but unlike human engineers, they are ephemeral - their reasoning, decisions, and tool calls vanish the moment the session ends. Modern Security incidents involving intent mismatch or injection are becoming increasingly common - forcing us to address AI Agents as an insider threat. No widely adopted standard yet enables agentic provenance and governance and its obvious that you can't hold an ephemeral process accountable. The git log was designed for human commits. It shows what changed. It does not show what an AI agent did, which model it used, which tools it called, or whether anyone was accountable for the outcome. Every governance framework, every audit trail, every compliance control in the SDLC was built around one assumption: a human made the decision. That assumption no longer holds. This shift introduces 3 main procedural problems (not addressing scale) - Supply-chain vector - The agentic coder is software, so it is a supply-chain security risk. Policy guardrails - How to ensure the agentic coder is compliant with the policies of the organization. Task-alignment - How to align the agentic coder on its tasks and goals. We introduce Agentic Process Evidence (APE), a signed, tamper-evident, machine-readable attestation of agentic processes, linking the sessions to their outcome (process-aware logging). APE enables Policy-as-Code control over the agentic processes, allowing for human in the loop only when it's needed. We support the in-toto style attestation framework, and the protocol is aligned with the relevant regulations
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Software Engineering (cs.SE); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.40071 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.40071v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.40071

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Yuval Kainan [view email]
[v1] Thu, 29 Oct 2026 13:50:54 UTC (27 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org