跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Keyang Chen, Mingxuan Jiang, Zeping Li, Yiwen Zhao, Yifan Wang, Qiuyang Zhang, Shuaicheng Qi, Yicun Liu, Zhixin Li, Sen Liu, Yinan Jing, Guangnan Ye, Hongfeng Chai·· 2 小时前AI 评分36

FraudSociety:面向金融诈骗经济的生成式智能体社会模拟器

FraudSociety: A Generative Agent-Based Society for the Financial-Fraud Economy

AI 导读

研究者推出 FraudSociety,首个基于 LLM 智能体的金融诈骗联合模拟器,同时建模信息传播与金融账本两类动态,并以 Need-Intent-Action 架构驱动平民决策、诈骗者随交互历史自适应。模拟结果在宏观上贴近真实统计,微观上重现损失集中度——前 10% 受害记录占总损失 81.1%;反诈实验中最优个性化干预将重复付款率从 49.4% 降至 10.9%。

正文 · 原文

Authors:Keyang Chen, Mingxuan Jiang, Zeping Li, Yiwen Zhao, Yifan Wang, Qiuyang Zhang, Shuaicheng Qi, Yicun Liu, Zhixin Li, Sen Liu, Yinan Jing, Guangnan Ye, Hongfeng Chai

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Financial fraud caused over \$15.9 billion in losses in the United States in 2025, according to the Federal Trade Commission~\citep{ftc2026databook}. Understanding such large-scale harm requires jointly modeling informational and financial dynamics. Yet existing simulators typically capture only one side of this interaction, leaving a gap in modeling how fraud unfolds in the real world. To bridge this gap, we introduce \textsc{FraudSociety}, the first LLM-agent-based simulator that jointly models these coupled dynamics. It integrates a dynamic social environment for information exposure and communication, persistent financial ledgers that preserve payment and loss histories, and a Need-Intent-Action architecture for civilian decision making. Fraudsters further adapt their communication and financial actions to individual interaction histories and ledger states, forming a closed feedback loop between the two dynamics. We validate \textsc{FraudSociety} across macro-level outcomes, micro-level behavior, and intervention effects. At the macro level, the simulated fraud outcomes closely match real-world patterns across multiple key statistics. At the micro level, it reproduces strong loss concentration, with the top 10\% of victimization records accounting for 81.1\% of total losses, consistent with Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre statistics~\citep{cafc2025annual}. Counter-fraud experiments further reveal variation across intervention strategies, with the best-performing personalized intervention reducing the repeat-payment rate from 49.4\% to 10.9\%. These results establish \textsc{FraudSociety} as both a high-fidelity simulator and a scalable testbed for evaluating anti-fraud strategies under diverse intervention conditions, thereby advancing research on financial fraud and its prevention.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.33536 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.33536v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.33536

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Mingxuan Jiang [view email]
[v1] Sat, 24 Oct 2026 08:26:22 UTC (2,613 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org