跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Honson Ling, Kidus Admassu, Stephanie Rosenthal·· 3 小时前AI 评分44

SME-C:专家点评结合 LLM 迭代精炼,构建高质量 AI 评测数据集的方法

Pairing Expert Critique with LLM-Driven Refinement: An Iterative Approach for Curating Quality AI Evaluation Datasets

AI 导读

研究者提出 SME-C,一种通过领域专家轻量点评候选回答、再由 LLM 迭代精炼,来构建领域专属评测数据集与评分标准的人机协作流程。该流程在金融商业简报领域验证:411 名金融从业者在两轮调查中对 520 个查询提交了 3,853 条点评,并测试基于专家书面点评和仅基于偏好投票两种 LLM 精炼策略。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Evaluating and improving domain-specific LLM responses requires high-quality reference data and rubrics, yet expert authoring is slow and expensive, and synthetic datasets may fail to capture practitioner preferences unless they are grounded in expert judgment. We present SME-C (Subject Matter Expert Critique), a human-AI workflow that captures expertise through lightweight critiques of candidate responses and complements it with LLM-driven analysis and refinement to iteratively curate response datasets and evaluation rubrics. We validate SME-C in the domain of financial business briefs, collecting 3,853 critiques from 411 finance professionals on 520 queries across two survey rounds. We evaluate two LLM-driven refinement strategies: one guided by the experts' written critiques and one that infers critique solely from their preference votes. In a blind validation survey with 100 additional professionals, we found that both strategies significantly improved quality over the experts' top-ranked baseline responses. The gains were concentrated among weaker original responses, and the two strategies excelled in different ways: critique-based refinement produced more domain-grounded improvements, whereas vote-based refinement was more effective at identifying and removing irrelevant content. The resulting rubrics and refined dataset support reproducible offline evaluation and benchmarking of LLMs, suggesting that structured expert critique is a viable alternative to expert authoring for building high-quality, domain-specific evaluation resources more quickly, at scale, and at lower cost.
Comments: 20 pages, 7 figures, 9 tables
Subjects: Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
ACM classes: H.5.3; I.2.7; H.1.2
Cite as: arXiv:2611.05749 [cs.HC]
  (or arXiv:2611.05749v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.05749

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Honson Ling [view email]
[v1] Tue, 3 Nov 2026 23:38:56 UTC (2,889 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org