跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Hongyu H\`e, Minhao Jin, Maria Apostolaki·· 4 小时前AI 评分50

ReGuard 框架发现并防护 RL 网络控制器的最坏情形场景

Worst-Case Discovery and Runtime Protection for RL-Based Network Controllers

AI 导读

论文提出 ReGuard 框架,用于发现 RL 网络控制器的最坏情形场景并在推理时加以防护,无需重训练。它把场景发现表述为双层遗憾最大化问题,编译出仅在风险状态介入的轻量逻辑规则;在 Pensieve、Sage、Park 三个控制器上发现 43-64% 的性能损失,暴露的差距比最强基线大 57% 至 6 倍,首次迭代即通过规则防护缩小 79-85%,USENIX NSDI 2027 发表。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:RL-based controllers achieve strong average-case performance in networking tasks such as congestion control and adaptive bitrate streaming. Yet their performance can degrade severely under network conditions where strong performance is still achievable. Identifying such conditions and quantifying the resulting performance gap is intractable by enumeration, while the sequential and closed-loop nature of RL controllers makes formal verification methods impractical.
We present ReGuard, a framework that discovers worst-case scenarios for a given RL controller and protects it against them at inference time without retraining. ReGuard formulates scenario discovery as a bilevel regret-maximization problem, certifying a lower bound on the controller's worst-case performance gap. ReGuard then analyzes the discovered counterfactual trajectories and compiles them into lightweight logic rules that intervene only when a risky state is detected, leaving the controller's behavior unchanged otherwise.
We evaluate ReGuard across three RL-based network controllers: Pensieve, Sage, and Park. ReGuard discovers scenarios in which each controller suffers a 43-64% performance loss relative to what is achievable under the same conditions. ReGuard exposes performance gaps 57% to 6 times larger than those found by the strongest baselines and shrinks those gaps by 79-85% in its first iteration via lightweight rule-based protection, iteratively driving the remaining gap toward nominal levels. ReGuard's protection extends beyond the scenarios it discovers, improving performance across a wide range of network conditions.
Comments: Published at USENIX NSDI 2027
Subjects: Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
MSC classes: 68M12, 68M15, 68T05, 68Q25, 68M20
ACM classes: C.2.2; I.2.6; C.4; C.2.6
Cite as: arXiv:2605.04373 [cs.NI]
  (or arXiv:2605.04373v2 [cs.NI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.04373

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Hongyu Hè [view email]
[v1] Wed, 6 May 2026 00:42:32 UTC (1,606 KB)
[v2] Thu, 5 Nov 2026 00:02:17 UTC (3,963 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org