arXiv cs.AI· Chanwoo Park, Jaywoong Jeong, Zachary Wojtowicz, Yubin Kim, Taekyun Lee, Kaiqing Zhang, Asuman Ozdaglar·· 2 小时前AI 评分56
TeamGym:面向分布式信息团队决策的智能体评测与训练环境
TeamGym: A Gym for Team Decision-Making by AI Agents with Distributed Information
AI 导读
MIT 等机构研究者在 arXiv 发布 TeamGym,一个基于法律、金融、医疗和软件工程真实语料构建的团队决策评测与训练环境,可控制并追踪参与者间的关键信息分布。对 12 个语料上 8 个语言模型的测试显示,分散关键信息使成功率平均下降 22.9 个百分点,需自行检索信息再降 19.9 点;用团队决策损失做强化学习训练可提升最终决策质量,并在参与、发言者选择和沟通上涌现协调行为。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:Many real-world decisions require teams to integrate information distributed across participants. Yet AI agents are still primarily trained and benchmarked in isolation. We introduce TeamGym, an environment for evaluating and training language model-based agents on team decision-making problems constructed from real-world legal, finance, medical, and software engineering corpora. TeamGym introduces a method to identify a minimal set of facts, each element of which is necessary and all of which are collectively sufficient for a correct final decision, which we call pivotal information. This enables TeamGym to both control the distribution of pivotal information and track how well agents identify and integrate pivotal information when making team decisions. Examining 8 language models on 12 source corpora, we find that current AI agents often fail to effectively share information: Distributing pivotal information across participants lowers success rate by 22.9 percentage points on average relative to giving the same information to a single model (a communication gap). We also document that participants do not effectively retrieve decision-relevant information on their own: A team's success rate is lowered by a further 19.9 points when participants must identify and extract pivotal information from source material rather than receiving it directly (a retrieval gap). To help remedy these deficits, we use TeamGym to train policies through reinforcement learning on team decision loss. Across two policy-training experiments, we find that training improves final-decision quality and induces emergent coordination in participation, speaker selection, and communication, even though the reward evaluates only the final decision.
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.37571 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2610.37571v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.37571 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Chanwoo Park [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 27 Oct 2026 17:15:54 UTC (2,161 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org