arXiv cs.AI· Yichiet Aun (Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman), Mohammed A. Alhartomi (University of Tabuk), Jing Jie Tan (National University of Singapore), Waqas Nadeem (Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman), Adeb Salh (Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman), Shankar Karuppayah (Bitranger, CYRES, Universiti Sains Malaysia), Sin Chee Tan (ABLEs)·· 3 小时前AI 评分55
arXiv 论文提出 germline 执行,防护签名 MCP 工具中的恶意代码数据泄露
Signed, Sealed, Leaked: Trust Beyond Signature for MCP Toolchains
AI 导读
arXiv 论文(arXiv:2611.06585)展示一个合法签名的 MCP 工具可借助策略允许的目的地隐匿泄露敏感数据,Meta 的 MCPGuard-Dynamic 在每次试验中均未能阻止该攻击。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:AI agents rely on third-party tools, such as Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, whose publishers can be authenticated and whose execution can be restricted by runtime security policies. Yet authenticity does not guarantee benign behaviour: a legitimately signed tool may perform its advertised function while concealing malicious code that leaks confidential information. We demonstrate this trust failure with a signed MCP tool that embeds sensitive data in requests to a policy-allowed destination. Meta's MCPGuard-Dynamic, a state-of-the-art runtime defence, blocks a direct exfiltration attempt in the same run, yet fails to prevent this attack in every trial. We introduce germline execution, which limits information disclosure without inspecting or trusting tool implementations. Each tool invocation runs in ephemeral copies forked from a data-free germline process, each receiving only information authorised for its destination. Even if malicious code executes, what it can disclose is bounded by the data available to its copy. Under explicit assumptions on copy confinement and a data-free germline, we prove sink noninterference for every signed release and, for releases deterministic within our replay model, show that a verified witness establishes a flow violation. Across 153 attack runs, no unauthorised disclosure was detected under germline execution, compared with 5.9-74.5% of runs under baseline defences and an ablation. Invocations served by a single copy completed in 10-49 ms, 2-28x faster than restarting the tool for every invocation, the conventional way to clear state. These results show that data-isolated execution protects agent toolchains against malicious code concealed within authenticated software.
| Comments: | 24 pages, 5 figures, 15 tables |
| Subjects: | Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2611.06585 [cs.CR] |
| (or arXiv:2611.06585v1 [cs.CR] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.06585 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Yichiet Aun [view email]
[v1]
Wed, 4 Nov 2026 14:40:32 UTC (230 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org