跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Qingyuan Zeng, Ziyang Chen, Pengxiang Cai, Zixin Guan, Anglin Liu, Lang Qin, Xinyao Lai, Jintai Chen·· 4 小时前AI 评分36

SCENE 框架如何将宽泛的生物医学知识转化为场景化命题

Can Broad Biomedical Knowledge be Contextualized into Scenario-Grounded Propositions?

AI 导读

arXiv 论文提出 SCENE,一个双层多智能体框架,把知识语境化视为迭代搜索:上层将宽泛知识转为搜索方向并锚定到数据集 schema,下层通过多目标优化找出兼顾证据强度与数据支持的具体命题。在临床试验中 SCENE 发现异质性治疗获益的患者亚组并优于现有基线;在 LINCS L1000 研究中识别出靶点-响应匹配度高、阳性率高的扰动语境,产出可追溯、可检验的假设。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Biomedical discovery often requires connecting broad biomedical knowledge with specific experimental or clinical data. Background knowledge suggests relevant mechanisms but is usually too general to map directly onto dataset variables, while data-driven patterns can be dataset-specific and hard to interpret mechanistically. We study this missing link as knowledge contextualization: transforming broad biomedical knowledge into evidence-supported, scenario-grounded propositions that domain experts can inspect, replay, and validate. We propose SCENE, a bi-level multi-agent framework that treats knowledge contextualization as iterative search. The upper level converts broad knowledge into search directions and grounds them in the dataset schema. The lower level executes these directions through multi-objective optimization to identify concrete propositions that balance evidential strength and data support. Feedback between the two levels progressively refines the search. We evaluate SCENE in two settings: discovering patient subgroups with heterogeneous treatment benefits in clinical trial scenarios, and identifying context-specific biological responses in LINCS L1000 studies. In clinical trials, SCENE discovers specific, well-supported subgroups and outperforms existing baselines. In L1000 studies, SCENE identifies perturbational contexts with strong target-response matching and high positive rates. These results show that SCENE bridges broad knowledge and scenario-specific evidence, producing traceable, inspectable hypotheses for follow-up validation.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.27082 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2605.27082v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27082

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Qingyuan Zeng [view email]
[v1] Tue, 26 May 2026 14:33:03 UTC (1,139 KB)
[v2] Thu, 22 Oct 2026 18:54:23 UTC (1,438 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org